One of the most amazing cases in Spain on ESP and macro-PK research is Mónica Nieto (Carballal, 2023). She was 15 years old at the beginning of the research in 1987. According to her mother, she folded a piece of cutlery in 1977 while listening to a radio broadcast, which was similar to what Uri Geller did on TV two years before. Mónica Nieto reported to family and close friends that she had strange perceptions and dreams, some of them premonitory.
The research on this case was conducted by the CEPEX (Centro de Estudios Parapsicológicos de Extremadura). The core research team was composed of Pedro Criado, Rafael Rivera, and Juan Carlos Hernández Cárrica. The researchers funded the entire three-year research project personally. They received no institutional support. Mónica Nieto never had any objections to the controls used by CEPEX. The research consisted of two phases: PK and ESP. All the data presented below regarding the research with Mónica Nieto comes from the CEPEX’s reports. These reports are currently in the possession of Manuel Carballal (2023), who presents these results in his book Investigación PSI.
The research team included, among others, physicists, psychiatrists, and illusionists. Out of 515 PK experiments, 292 gave positive results. On numerous occasions, the researchers placed the objects in sealed tubes. The participant could also return them to their original shape, after having been bent, with a 90% success rate. In some tests, she was asked to make the metal take certain shapes, with positive results. In April 1987, she did some tests similar to these in the presence of an unbiased witness (public notary), also with positive results. One interesting finding was that the temperature of Monica’s hands increased when she was bending metal. Other researchers corroborated this during the three years of research. In 1988, CEPEX unveiled the results of the PK research at a public conference. Mónica Nieto became famous internationally. Researchers from other countries (Germany, Italy, and Japan, for example) traveled to Spain to study Monica, who even traveled to Japan to demonstrate her paranormal abilities.
The ESP results were poor regarding telepathy and precognition, but spectacular regarding clairvoyance – the results were far above chance. Again, CEPEX carried out another session with an unbiased witness, also with successful results.
However, Mónica Nieto was not interested in proving these abilities. She took the tests at her mother’s insistence. When she turned 18, the age when a person is considered an adult in Spain, she refused to take any more tests and disappeared. Guessing Zener cards or bending metal seemed silly to her; she once said to one of the researchers, Manuel Carballal, that she would like to do something useful with her ability, such as healing. Today, she works as an herbalist, and she uses her “power,” if we can call it that, for healing.
To fully understand the history of parapsychology in Spain, it is necessary to take into account the role of television. In the 1980s, there were TV shows about parapsychology and related topics, with guests who had a scientific background. In 1990, private television channels began broadcasting. These new channels did great damage to academic parapsychology because they offered a grotesque and ridiculous image of parapsychology. This favored the skeptical movement because it gave credibility to the idea that parapsychology is a pseudoscience.
Two of the most prominent pseudo-skeptical groups in Spain were Alternativa Racional a las Pseudociencias (Rational Alternative to Pseudoscience), founded in 1986. It changed its name to ARP – Sociedad para el Avance del Pensamiento Crítico (Society for the Advancement of Critical Thinking) in 1998. The other main group was Círculo Escéptico (Skeptical Circle), which split from ARP and was founded in 2001. In theory, its objective was to fight against pseudoscience and promote critical thinking. But nothing is what it seems with pseudo-skepticism. These groups have a dark side that reflects their true purpose, a purpose that has little to do with promoting critical thinking. They continually put scientific parapsychology on the same status as believing in outlandish claims. They mobilize very aggressive public campaigns against any university that carries out any activity that these pseudo-skeptics consider pseudoscience. Why is pseudo-skepticism so successful in Spain? Real skepticism is necessary. However, these groups did not espouse real skepticism. Pseudo-skeptical discourse is successful among academics because it remains unaware of the existence and history of scientific research in parapsychology. Psuedo-skeptics have a distorted image of parapsychology as being far from scientific research. Sometimes universities themselves take advantage of the tactics of pseudo-skeptics for their internal struggles if necessary. This happened in the 1970s and 1980s with the pioneers in parapsychology research in Spain – many academics now do not carry out research or education on parapsychology due to fear of the consequences in their academic career.